정기선사의 환적항 선택요인에 관한 실증연구
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 황호경 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-22T06:58:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-02-22T06:58:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 56904-11-24 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://kmou.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000002175794 | ko_KR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.kmou.ac.kr/handle/2014.oak/10101 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In recent days, container throughput has been continuously increased due to the world's economic growth and the expanding trade volume as a result of globalization. Additionally, in the course of pursuing the effectiveness in the transporting system. the role of the transshipment at port has become more significant. And for the purpose of cutting down operating cost, the average size of ships continues to grow over time. Each country is developing port facilities, fighting to win the competition for hub port position of the transshipment. Also the terminal operators seek to achieve their demands. This research investigated the factors which affect the liner's selection of transshipment port and their relative importance by questioning those responsible in the business. The result was throughly examined using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Based on the findings, the four ports- Busan, Kwangyang, Shanghai, Ninbo - all situated in the North East Asia - were compared which are considered as potential rivals in future. The followings are the crucial factors a liner considers when faced with the transshipment port selection. To begin, it appears that the external factors are far more influencive than the internal ones. This is to say that, in reality, the effects upon the transshipment selection by the port authority or terminal operating company are limited to a certain extent. Secondly, amongst the external factors of the port, export/import throughput is considered the most vital, followed by the distance from the trunk route, annual operating days and then the distance from the feeder port. And the order in the internal factors of the port is the costs, the productivity, the feeder network and the facilities. Finally, when these major ports have been compared based on the derived relative importances of the factorts, Busan resulted to be the most competitive transshipment port, then followed by Shanghai, Kwangyang and Ningbo. | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 제1장 서론 = 1 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 2 제2장 해운항만시장의 현황 = 4 제1절 컨테이너 시장 = 4 제2절 환적 시장 = 6 제3절 컨테이너선의 대형화 = 9 제3장 환적의 개념 및 환적항 선택요인 = 14 제1절 환적의 개념 = 14 제2절 환적의 유형 = 16 제3절 환적항 선택요인에 관한 선행연구 = 18 제4장 정기선사의 환적항 선택 의사결정모형 구축 = 22 제1절 계층분석적의사결정법(AHP)의 고찰 = 22 제2절 환적항만 세부평가요소의 도출 = 35 제3절 평가 대안 설정 및 계층분석 구조 = 37 제4절 설문조사 대상자의 선정과 응답 결과 = 44 제5장 환적항 선택요인에 대한 AHP 분석 결과 = 46 제1절 계층별 중요도 평가 = 46 제2절 대안별 평가결과 = 49 제3절 분석 결과의 시사점 = 53 제6장 결론 = 55 제1절 연구의 요약 = 55 제2절 연구의 한계 및 향후 연구 방향 = 56 참고문헌 = 58 부록 = 61 | - |
dc.language | kor | - |
dc.publisher | 한국해양대학교 해사산업대학원 | - |
dc.title | 정기선사의 환적항 선택요인에 관한 실증연구 | - |
dc.title.alternative | An Empirical Study on the Factors of Liner's Transshipment Port Selection | - |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.awarded | 2009-02 | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Hwang | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Ho-Kyung | - |
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.