중국해상법상 해상여객운송계약에 관한 연구
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 정재영 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-22T07:03:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-02-22T07:03:15Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 56823-11-10 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://kmou.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000002175876 | ko_KR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.kmou.ac.kr/handle/2014.oak/10198 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The marine contract provisions in the Maritime Code of the People's Republic of the China (MCC) are the main legal sources of the contract of carriage of passenger by sea in China. On international carriage, except MCC, Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by sea, 1974 is also applied. This study bases on the provision of MCC. The concrete scope is as follows: 1) Introduction to international convention and legislative examples of various countries on the contract of carriage of passengers by sea.(Chapter 2) 2) The concept and nature of the contract of carriage of passengers by sea. (Chapter 3) 3) The conclusion and cancellation of the contract of carriage of passengers by sea. (Chapter 4) 4) Legal effect of the contract of carriage of passengers by sea.(Chapter 5) 5) Conclusion. (Chapter 5) Through the study of the Contract of Carriage of Passengers by sea of MCC, this thesis points out the weak points in MCC and also puts forward some legislative suggestions and remedy measures as follows: 1) In MCC, passenger includes those who go on board without paying a fare to the carrier with the consent of the carrier and those who are exempted from being considered under related provision. It is necessary to provide the liability of the carrier to them. 2) Because the time of contract's conclusion is involved in whether right and obligation is exist it is provided in MCC, specially in the case of the charter party. 3) In order to balance the benefit of the carrier and passenger, it is necessary to provide the condition of canceling contract to change the situation that carrier one-sidedly provides the condition. 4) In the matter of performing carrier's liability in MCC on the existing provision, it should be added that the performing carrier applies the provision of carrier's liability for the part of the carriage performed by him. Otherwise it makes mistake that the performing carrier should be responsible for the whole carriage periods. 5) In order to protect benefit of the passenger for the suffered as a result of the death of or personal injury to a passenger caused by a shipping incident, the carrier should be liable regardless of the existing of carrier's fault. Simultaneously, "defect in the ship", as one of the ship incident, should be defined because it is closely connected with the strict liability of the carrier. 6) Pecuniary loss resulting from the passenger's delayed arrival and the luggage not having been redelivered to the passenger within the stipulated time, as breach of contract, carriers should indemnify for it. 7) Limit of liability of the carrier who engaged in civil carriage should be raised according to the nation's economical level. In order to solve the matter that avoided the appliance of the limitation of liability of the carrier, when claiming for carrier's liability in tort, it is necessary for the passenger to provide the limitation of liability of the carrier and it must be applied in all the claim what instituted about passenger's damage and injury in the course of carriage by sea. Global limitation of carrier's liability for passenger's death and injury should to be repealed, if china wants to develop the business in super cruise ship. 8) Because the current law and the system of insurance don't solve the matter what secures the passenger receiving indemnity from carrier in MCC. The compulsory insurance system should be introduced and the insured amount should be fixed by taking account of the insure market's undertaking ability and carrier's economic level. | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 제1장 머리말 1 제1절 硏究의 背景과 目的 1 제2절 硏究의 範圍 및 方法 2 제2장 海上旅客運送에 關한 國際協約 및 立法例 4 제1절 아테네協約 以前의 國際協約 4 Ⅰ. 1961년 海上旅客運送에 關한 國際協約 4 Ⅱ. 1967년 海上旅客手荷物의 運送에 關한 國際協約 8 제2절 아테네 協約 13 Ⅰ. 1974年 아테네 協約 14 Ⅱ. 1976年 아테네 協約 改正議定書 15 Ⅲ. 1990年 아테네 協約 改正議定書 16 Ⅳ. 2002年 아테네 協約 改正議定書 16 제3절 各國의 立法例 20 Ⅰ. 英國 20 Ⅱ. 美國 21 Ⅲ. 日本 21 Ⅳ. 韓國 22 제3장 海上旅客運送契約의 意義와 法的 性質 23 제1절 意義 23 Ⅰ. 海上旅客運送契約의 槪念 23 Ⅱ. 海上旅客運送契約에 관한 法律의 沿革과 體系 27 제2절 法的 性質 29 Ⅰ. 雙務․ | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 不要式契約性 30 Ⅲ. 都給契約性 30 Ⅳ. 附合契約性 31 제4장 海上旅客運送契約의 成立과 終了 32 제1절 契約의 成立 32 Ⅰ. 契約의 當事者 32 Ⅱ. 成立時期 35 제2절 契約의 終了 38 Ⅰ. 旅客의 任意解除 38 Ⅱ. 不可抗力으로 因한 終了 40 제5장 海上旅客運送契約의 效果 41 제1절 運送人의 權利와 義務 41 Ⅰ. 權利 41 Ⅱ. 義務 43 제2절 海上旅客運送人의 責任 45 Ⅰ. 責任主體 46 Ⅱ. 責任期間 50 Ⅲ. 責任原則 52 Ⅳ. 抗辯事由 62 Ⅴ. 責任對象의 範圍 64 Ⅵ. 責任制限 67 Ⅶ. 責任輕減의 禁止 76 제3절 强制保險 77 Ⅰ. 意義 77 Ⅱ. 形式 79 Ⅲ. 內容 81 Ⅳ. 直接請求權 84 제6장 맺음말 86 參考文獻 90 | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 有償契約性 29 Ⅱ. 諾成․ | - |
dc.language | kor | - |
dc.publisher | 한국해양대학교 대학원 | - |
dc.title | 중국해상법상 해상여객운송계약에 관한 연구 | - |
dc.title.alternative | A Study on the Contract of Carriage of Passengers by Sea of Chinese Maritime Code | - |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.awarded | 2004-02 | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Cai Rong Zheng | - |
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.