컨테이너 터미널의 생산성 평가지표에 관한 연구
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 서정태 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-22T07:09:40Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-02-22T07:09:40Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 56879-03-02 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://kmou.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000002176025 | ko_KR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.kmou.ac.kr/handle/2014.oak/10362 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Northeast Asia is in the center of the world's 3rd largest market handling 36% of the world trade backed by high economic growth of China. At the same time, ports in the region fiercely compete with each other to become mega-hub port. International maritime & logistics environment is also changing rapidly with some trends such as vessels getting larger and a few carriers dominating market through M&A and Alliance. This new environment is creating demand for high added-value logistics space. Despite Busan Port's such advantages as main trunk route location and excellent feeder network, major Chinese ports, with their heavy local cargo volume, pose serious challenge to the position of Busan Port. Therefore Busan Port needs to make qualitative strategy to attract high added-value cargo as well as to timely develop infrastructure and to improve productivity. In the future, Busan Port will need to make more efforts to enhance productivity by removing inefficient factors in equipment and operating system as well as to push ahead with cost-saving & service improvement strategy. This paper carried out a theoretical inquiry into productivity of container terminal by means of examining various factors affecting terminal productivity and analyzing previous studies at home and abroad on measuring productivity. Based on that, gross berth productivity(GBP), throughput per berth length, throughput per employee, throughput per container yard were designated as basic productivity indicator of Busan Port container terminal. Other indicators proposed in other early papers were integrated into qualitative indicator called "productivity enhancement efforts". "Year-on-year GBP growth" was added as another indictor to encourage "late starter" to boost their productivity. The objective in making indicator is to encourage productivity enhancement in domestic container terminals. Utilizing the indicators mentioned above, the paper compared Busan Port container terminal productivity within North Port Productivity indicator is a very necessary tool to enhance terminal productivity because it helps figure out what factor determines productivity. Therefore, terminal operators need to change their negative view on productivity evaluation and take more proactive stance in managing productivity related data and in making use of evaluation result to their advantage. | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Abstract 제1장 서론-1 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적-1 제2절 연구의 방법 및 내용-2 제2장 컨테이너 터미널의 경쟁환경 변화-4 제1절 대외적 환경변화-4 제2절 환경변화가 컨테이너터미널에 미치는 영향-8 제3장 컨테이너 터미널의 생산성 개념-14 제1절 생산성의 개념-14 제2절 컨테이너터미널의 생산성 개념-14 제3절 컨테이너 터미널의 생산성 측정사례-17 제4절 분석 결과 및 시사점-20 제4장 컨테이너터미널 생산성에 미치는 요인분석-22 제1절 컨테이너터미널의 기능 및 시설-22 제2절 하역 및 이송장비-24 제3절 야드운영시스템-26 제4절 자동화컨테이너 터미널-27 제5절 정보시스템-28 제6절 노무공급시스템-30 제7절 연계수송체계-30 제8절 시사점-30 제5장 컨테이너터미널 생산성 평가지표 선정-31 제1절 컨테이너터미널 프로세스별 기본생산성 평가지표 분석31 제2절 컨테이너 터미널 생산성 평가지표 선정-37 제3절 컨테이너 터미널 생산성 평가지표 적용-40 제4절 컨테이너 터미널 생산성 평가지표 비교․ | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 분석-47 제5절 평가-49 제6장 결론--50 | - |
dc.language | kor | - |
dc.publisher | 한국해양대학교 대학원 | - |
dc.title | 컨테이너 터미널의 생산성 평가지표에 관한 연구 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Productivity Evaluation Indicator of Container Terminal | - |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.awarded | 2008-08 | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Seo Jeong Tae | - |
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.