한국해양대학교

Detailed Information

Metadata Downloads

海賊行爲 豫防 및 處理에 關한 法制上 改善方案 硏究

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author 손태기 -
dc.date.accessioned 2017-02-22T07:25:07Z -
dc.date.available 2017-02-22T07:25:07Z -
dc.date.issued 2014 -
dc.date.submitted 57042-05-01 -
dc.identifier.uri http://kmou.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000002176380 ko_KR
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kmou.ac.kr/handle/2014.oak/10782 -
dc.description.abstract Today, as the world economy becomes globalized and integrated, the importance of maritime shipping is also growing. While maritime shipping is central to South Korea's economy to the extent that its trade volume over the sea takes up approximately 99.7% of the total trade, South Korea faces increasing maritime threats such as maritime terrorism, piracy and armed robbery. Among other maritime security issues, growing piracy and armed robbery at sea have recently drawn attention of the international commu -nity. Given the seriousness of the threats, the international community has relied on the international law such as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea(UNCLOS) in order to tackle piracy as well as multi -national anti-piracy operations based on the UN Security Council resolu -tions. However, it has not seen tangible achievements yet partly because of the limitations inherent in the international judicial system such as lack of enforcing power and difficulties in international collaboration. For South Korea, the M/V Tenyu incident in September 1998 was the turning point that stimulates the South Korean government to establish measures against piracy at sea. That said, the government started to realize the necessity to have a proactive and systemic approach to counter-piracy activities for the safety of merchant vessels and crew of South Korea. Accordingly, the government has strengthened international cooperation and deployed the Cheonghae Unit to the Gulf of Aden every six months. A lot of studies have been conducted on law enforcement against maritime crimes and the establishment of maritime safety systems particularly since South Korea experienced several problems in the process of conducting follow-up actions after the Operation Dawn of Gulf of Aden including handling captured pirates and legal processes. However, there has been little effort to study specific problems derived from the lack of enforcing power of inter -national law and limitations of international institutions as well as mea -sures to address the problems. This study analyzes pirate activities that have adverse effects on the Sea Lines of Communication(SLOC). It also examines problems embedded in international organizations, international and domestic laws related to anti -piracy activities from the perspectives of military security and international institutions. First, from the viewpoint of international law, it is required to redefine the concept of piracy in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. According to the convention, if a piracy occurred within the terri -torial waters of a coastal state, it is not subject to international regulations because the matter falls under the coastal state's jurisdiction. In order to overcome this institutional limitation, there should be an agreement that helps tackle such problem internationally. At the same time, we should have a measure to quickly respond to maritime terrorism. Most of all, some kind of universal jurisdiction should be established among all the states so that any state can deploy its naval ships or government vessels and seize those involved in terrorism in the international waters. Second, the international community should establish an agreement that supports punitive actions against pirates or armed robbers. Most pirates and armed robbers exploit bad economic condition and unstable domestic security of the states. Such state are likely to suffer from corruption within their own governments. These conditions make it hard to prevent such illegal activities at sea. Therefore, states in the international community must forge an agreement that each state mandatorily establish domestic laws defining punishment for piracy and armed robbery. States also need to work on bilateral or multilateral ways to support law enforcement activities of other states in the region of concern through joint monitoring and close cooperation. Third, we must have a comprehensive counter-piracy strategy based on international cooperation. For example, states may set up a foundation through bilateral or multilateral agreement for establishing special courts and correctional institutions that can accommodate captured pirates and other criminals. Fourth, the international community should seek a multilateral maritime cooperation system. Given the lack of multilateral security institutions in East Asia compared to Europe, utilizing already existing institutions may be a good starting point. Further, we need to materialize the South Korea -ASEAN security dialogue that President Park Geun Hye proposed at the 2013 South Korea-ASEAN Summit. Fifth, given the fact that threats of piracy spread around the world including the west coast of Africa and the Indian Ocean, multinational efforts should be made to prepare for the geographic expansion of piracy. Sixth, we need a clearer resolution at the UN. Since the UNSC resolution 1816(June 2, 2008) does not clearly define “acts of piracy and armed robbery,” it is also unclear what measures within the boundary of international law are allowed to take against pirates in the international waters. In order to address fundamental problems of piracy, first of all, we need to establish a clear definition of what constitutes piracy. Then, we should make sure that the deployed naval forces have self-defense rights, constabulary authority, and, if necessary, rights for preemptive attacks and blockade on shore facilities. From the perspective of domestic law, states should establish domestic legal tools in a way that they are conducive to the implementation of the international law. Since South Korea does not have domestic laws that address the cases involving piracy, there exist many legal problems in the procedure of handling captured pirates. Therefore, South Korea should carry out the obligation of international cooperation for combating piracy through the revision of criminal law article 340 that deals with maritime robbery crime and the criminal law for the harmful behaviors on vessels and structures on the water. It also should revise legal systems for smooth international cooperations on legal matters. Second, a special legislature for the military activities off the coast of Somalia is required. As the threat from piracy continues, the deployment of the Cheonghae Unit will also continues for the time being. For the effective anti-piracy operations, the Unit needs a special law that provides a judical ground for commanding officers of the ships so that they are allowed to execute criminal laws against the pirates. Third, the South Korean government needs to manage maritime related affairs in a more integrated and efficient manner than now. Maritime affairs involve many governmental organizations including the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, the Ministry of National Defense, the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, the Republic of Korea Navy, and the Korea Coast Guard. We need an organization that can oversee and manage all these works carried out by different organizations in an integrated fashion. Third, shipping companies should make their own preparation for the case of hijacking including establishing specific procedures and instructions for responding to piracy situations. From the perspective of international organizations, efforts to address fundamental problems in order to eradicate piracy are necessary. When poverty is a root cause for piracy, strengthening legal measures cannot be a practical and long-term solution. In this respect, particularly when a coastal state does not have proper law enforcement system, provision of economic support as well as training and equipment for law enforcement can be arranged through international organizations. In such a manner, the inter -national community can coordinate deployment of naval units to the scene. Second, various regional organizations for anti-piracy operations should be established. Such multinational organizations would help all units and forces engaging in counter-piracy operations including coast guards and naval patrol units share the same current operations picture. The mere fact that this kind of system exists may create deterrence against piracy. Thirds, efforts on the part of the shipping industry are also required. The industry should make sure that it has provided basic instructions and training for crew members of merchant vessels so that they have proper knowledge and equipment to protect themselves from piracy. Fourth, some countries that suffer from piracy do not even consider it a serious threat or major crime particularly when the pirates do harm to international shipping, not their countries. It would be important for the international community to share awareness about the nature of piracy. Fifth, we should make sure the implementation of the report to the UN Secretary General by the special advisor that proposed solutions to the fundamental problems involved in eradicating piracy including the improve -ment of economic and security situations in the areas of origin. From the perspective of military institutions, first, the revision of legal status for the Cheonghae Unit is necessary. The Cheonghae Unit should be given proper authorities and status so that it can carry out its missions effectively without any legal obstacles in law enforcement and the use of force. Therefore, the government should make an effort to provide a legal ground for the anti-piracy operations in Somalia through making a special law for military activities. Second, South Korea should put a lot of efforts in advancing naval forces that can address both transnational threats such as piracy and North Korean threats. It should also work on developing a strategy that can lead to the expansion of the ROK navy’s role in the future. Third, robust cooperation and coordination among different militaries must be maintained. Tracking and patrolling activities in anti-piracy operations often involve entering waters of other countries' jurisdiction. In this respect, seamless cooperation among different countries would be very useful for successful anti-piracy operations. Fourth, there should be efforts to develop effective C2(command and control) and informational sharing measures for the multinational anti-piracy operations. As numerous naval forces from different countries operate in the same area, a coordination system is necessary for effective command and control activities as well as information sharing. Fifth, for the protection of international shipping, a naval maritime traffic control system should be established for enhancing the effectiveness of patrol and convoy operations by multinational naval units. Maritime security does not depend on a single country. A vessel of any country can be a target of piracy. For these reasons, international colla -boration and joint efforts are the keys to protecting maritime traffics all around the world from threats of piracy. This way, we will be able to ensure peaceful use of the oceans by the members of the international community. -
dc.description.tableofcontents Abstract 第1章序論······························································································1 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 ······················································································1 제2절 연구의 내용 및 방법······················································································4 第2章海賊行爲에 關한 一般的考察··················································6 제1절 해적행위의 개념······························································································6 Ⅰ. 국제법적 개념·································································································7 Ⅱ. 국내법적 개념·······························································································10 제2절 해상교통로의 현황 및 가치········································································12 Ⅰ. 해상교통로의 현황 ·······················································································12 Ⅱ. 해상교통로의 가치 ·······················································································16 제3절 해적의 위협과 국제사회에 미치는 영향··················································19 Ⅰ. 해상에서의 초국가적 위협·········································································19 Ⅱ. 해상교통로 위협 ·························································································25 Ⅲ. 국제 테러리스트와의 연계 가능성 ···························································28 第3章海賊行爲發生現況分析························································32 제1절 해적행위의 발생 배경과 특징 ····································································32 Ⅰ. 해적행위의 발생 배경 ·················································································32 Ⅱ. 해적행위의 특징 ···························································································35 제2절 해적조직의 구성 및 해적행위 분석 ··························································42 Ⅰ. 해적조직의 구성 ···························································································42 Ⅱ. 해적행위의 분석 ···························································································44 제3절 지역별 해적행위 발생 동향 및 분석 ························································48 Ⅰ. 지역별 해적행위 발생 동향 ·······································································48 Ⅱ. 지역별 해적행위 발생 분석 ·····································································51 第4章海賊行爲關聯法制上爭點分析··········································54 제1절 국제법규 ··········································································································54 Ⅰ. 1982년 유엔해양법협약 ···············································································54 Ⅱ. 1988년 SUA협약··························································································57 Ⅲ. 아시아지역해적방지협력협정·····································································59 Ⅳ. 유엔안보리 결의안 ·······················································································61 Ⅴ. 국제법규상의 쟁점 분석 ···········································································71 제2절 국내법규 ··········································································································86 Ⅰ. 형법 ·················································································································87 Ⅱ. 선박위해법 ·····································································································88 Ⅲ. 해적행위 처리에 관한 특별법안·······························································91 Ⅳ. 국내법규상의 쟁점 분석 ·············································································92 제3절 국제기구 ··········································································································96 Ⅰ. 국제해사기구 ·································································································96 Ⅱ. 국제해사국 ·····································································································96 Ⅲ. 유엔안전보장이사회 ·····················································································97 Ⅳ. 국제기구상의 쟁점 분석 ·············································································98 제4절 군사제도 ········································································································101 Ⅰ. 청해부대·······································································································101 Ⅱ. 연합해군사 ···································································································109 Ⅲ. 군사제도상의 쟁점 분석 ···········································································114 第5章海賊行爲關聯法制上改善方案··········································121 제1절 국제법규 ········································································································121 Ⅰ. 1982년 유엔해양법협약상 해적개념의 재정립 ·····································121 Ⅱ. 국제협약에 해적 및 해상무장강도의 처벌규정 명기 ·························122 Ⅲ. 해적퇴치를 위한 국제공조 활동의 포괄적 대응전략 마련·····················123 Ⅳ. 동남아지역 다자간 해양협력체계 구축·················································124 Ⅴ. 해적위협의 지리적 확산에 대한 다자간 대응책 강구 ·····················126 Ⅵ. 유엔차원의 명확한 결의안 채택·····························································127 제2절 국내법규 ········································································································129 Ⅰ. 국내법 체계 정비 ·······················································································129 Ⅱ. 소말리아 해역에서의 국군부대 활동에 관한 특례법 제정 ···············130 Ⅲ. 해양업무의 통합적 관리기구의 설립 ·····················································131 Ⅳ. 국적 선사나 선박의 자구책 강구 ·························································132 제3절 국제기구 ········································································································134 Ⅰ. 해적퇴치를 위한 국제사회의 근원적 대응 노력 필요 ·······················134 Ⅱ. 지역별 다양한 해적처리기구 발전 ·························································135 Ⅲ. 국제 해운업계의 노력 ···············································································136 Ⅳ. 해양 영역에 대한 인식향상 ·····································································137 Ⅴ. 유엔사무총장 특별자문관의 신규대책 적극 시행 ·······························139 제4절 군사제도 ········································································································140 Ⅰ. 청해부대 법적 지위 개선·········································································140 Ⅱ. 한국 해군력 증강 및 역할 확대 ·····························································141 Ⅲ. 국제 군사협력 강화···················································································142 Ⅳ. 효율적인 지휘통제 및 정보공유체계 강구 ···········································144 Ⅴ. 상선운송 안전보장을 위한 해군해상교통관제 제도 도입·················146 第6章結論··························································································148 參考文獻 -
dc.language kor -
dc.publisher 한국해양대학교 대학원 -
dc.title 海賊行爲 豫防 및 處理에 關한 法制上 改善方案 硏究 -
dc.title.alternative A Study on the Legal Issues and Countermeasures coping with Piracy -
dc.type Thesis -
dc.date.awarded 2014-02 -
dc.contributor.alternativeName Son -
dc.contributor.alternativeName Tae-ki -
Appears in Collections:
해양군사학과 > Thesis
Files in This Item:
000002176380.pdf Download

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse