Inclusion effects of jack mackerel meal in diets containing different protein sources for olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus)
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 조성환 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 정해승 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-03T17:28:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-03T17:28:38Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2023-03-03 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.kmou.ac.kr/handle/2014.oak/13127 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://kmou.dcollection.net/common/orgView/200000665394 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 1. Dietary optimum inclusion level of jack mackerel meal for olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus, Temminck & Schlegel, 1846) Feed stimulants are used to incite feeding behavior in fish to improve feed consumption and growth. This study investigated the effect of jack mackerel meal (JM) as dietary attractant and/or stimulants on olive flounder on growth, feed utilization, chemical composition, plasma chemistry, and non-specific immune responses. In addition, the attractiveness of the experimental diets containing various levels of JM to olive flounder was determined. A total of 675 juveniles was randomly distributed to 27 tanks each containing 25 fish (initial weight of 5.3 g) for the 8-week feeding trial. The control diet (JM0) contains sixty percent fish meal (FM). The graded levels (1, 3, 5, 20, 20, 40, 60, and 100%) of JM were included at the expenses of FM, referred to as the JM1, JM3, JM5, JM10, JM20, JM40, JM60, and JM100 diets, respectively. Fish were fed ad libitum in triplicate groups of each diet twice a day for 8 weeks. To determine the attractiveness of the experimental diets, thirty fish were held in the acclimatization chamber at a time and a knockout comparison of the experimental diets was applied. The strongest feeding attractant response of olive flounder was observed in the JM60 diet, followed by the JM40 and JM20 diets, in that order. The greatest weight gain and specific growth rate (SGR) were recorded in fish fed the JM20 diet, followed by the JM40, JM60, JM100, JM10, JM5, JM3, JM1, and JM0 diets, in that order in the 8-week feeding trial. The highest feed consumption was obtained in fish fed the JM20 diet. None of the organosomatic indices (condition factor, and viscerosomatic and hepatosomatic indices), biochemical parameters, non-specific immune activities (superoxide dismutase and lysozyme activities), chemical composition and amino acid and fatty acid profiles of the whole body fish were affected by the experimental diets. The findings of this study demonstrated that the olfactory system incited attractiveness, while the gustatory system regulated the feeding, hence dietary optimal inclusion level of JM seemed to be 20%. 2. Inclusion effect of jack mackerel meal as feed stimulants in diets replacing different levels of fish meal with various animal protein sources on growth performance of olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) Fish meal (FM) is one of the costliest components in formulating fish feeds, so there is a high need to look for a replacer for FM. Incorporated feed stimulants into fish feeds is a very sustainable aquaculture technique, especially in developing low FM diet to improve feed consumption and growth performance. This study aims to evaluate substitution effect of different levels of FM with various animal protein sources in diets supplemented with 12% jack mackerel meal (JM) playing as feed stimulants on growth performance, feed utilization, chemical composition, amino and fatty acid profiles, and non-specific immune response of juvenile olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Two-way [3 substitution source; tuna by-product meal (TBM), chicken by-product meal (CBM), and meat meal (MM) × 2 substitution ratio; 25% and 50%] ANOVA experimental design was used. Seven experimentally formulated diets were prepared. The control (Con) diet contained 60% FM. Twenty-five and 50% of FM in the Con diet were substituted with TBM, CBM, and MM when 12% JM was included at the expense of FM, referred to as the TBM25, TBM50, CBM25, CBM50, MM25, and MM50 diets, respectively. All experimental diets were formulated to be isonitrogenous at 56.1% and isolipidic at 10.2%. Four hundred and twenty juvenile (initial weight of 18.0 g) fish were randomly distributed into 21, 50 L flow-through tanks (20 fish/tank) with three replicates of each diet. Both dietary substitution source and ratio had significant effects on weight gain, specific growth rate (SGR), and feed consumption of fish. Weight gain, SGR, and feed consumption of fish fed the Con diet was inferior to fish fed the TBM25, TBM50, and CBM25 diets, but comparable to fish fed the CBM50 and MM25 diets. However, no significant difference in feed utilization, chemical composition, amino and lipid acid profiles, and non-specific immune response of olive flounder was observed among the experimental diets. Conclusively, TBM and CBM, and MM could be used as the prominent substitutes for FM up to 50, and 25%, respectively in olive flounder feeds incorporated with JM as feed stimulants. The greatest growth performance and highest feed consumption were achieved in olive flounder fed the TBM50 diet. 3. Substitution effect of different levels of fish meal with various plant protein sources in diets supplemented with jack mackerel meal as feed stimulants on the growth, feed utilization, chemical composition, amino and fatty acid profiles, and non-specific immune response of juvenile olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) The use of plant protein sources as a substitute for fish meal (FM) in fish diet may deteriorate feed consumption by fish resulted from its reduced palatability. Therefore, an addition of feed stimulants is a very effective method as a sustainable fish culture technique to improve feed consumption by fish especially, in developing low FM-based diet. We aim to evaluate substitution effect of different levels of FM with various plant protein sources [corn gluten meal (CGM), soy protein concentrate (SPC), and corn protein concentrate (CPC)] in diets supplemented with jack mackerel meal (JM) as feed stimulants on growth of olive flounder. Two-way [2 substitution level (25 and 50%) × 3 substitution source (CGM, SPC and CPC)] ANOVA design was applied. Seven experimental diets were prepared. The control (Con) diet contained 60% FM. Twenty five and 50% FM in the Con diet were replaced with CGM, SPC, and CPC when 12% JM was included, referred to as the CGM25, CGM50, SPC25, SPC50, CPC25, and CPC50 diets, respectively. All experimental diets were isonitrogenous at 56.1% and isolipidic at 10.3%. A total of 420 juvenile fish (initial weight of 18 g) were randomly distributed into 21, 50 L flow-through tanks. All experimental diets were assigned to triplicate groups of fish. Fish were hand-fed to visual satiation twice a day, 7 days a week for 8 weeks. Weight gain, specific growth rate (SGR), and feed consumption of fish were affected by both substitution level and source. Weight gain of fish fed the Con and CGM25 diets was significantly higher than that of fish fed the CGM50, SPC50, and CPC50 diets. Feed consumption of fish was affected by both substitution level and source. Feed consumption of fish fed the Con, CGM25, SPC25, and CPC25 diets was higher than that of fish fed the CGM50, SPC50, and CPC50 diets. However, feed utilization, biochemical (proximate, amino acids, and fatty acids) composition, and non-specific immune responses of fish were not significantly affected by either substitution level or substitution source. In conclusion, FM up to 25% could be replaced with CGM, SPC, and CPC in diets without deteriorating growth performance of olive flounder when JM was included as feed stimulants | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Chapter 1. General Introduction 1 Chapter 2. Dietary optimum inclusion level of jack mackerel meal for olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus, Temminck & Schlegel, 1846) 6 1. Introduction 6 2. Materials and methods 10 2.1 Experimental conditions 10 2.2 Preparation of the experimental diets 11 2.3 Preparation of equipment to determine the attractiveness of the experimental diets to olive flounder 14 2.4 Preparation of the experimental fish 16 2.5 Determining the attractiveness of the experimental diets to olive flounder in tests 16 2.6 Measurement of biological indices of fish 17 2.7 Blood samples and non-specific immune responses of fish 17 2.8 Lysozyme activity assay 18 2.9 Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity assay 18 2.10 Analysis of the chemical composition of the experimental diets and the whole body fish 18 2.11 AA analysis of the experimental diets and whole body fish 19 2.12 Fatty acid (FA) analysis of the experimental diets and whole body fish 19 2.13 Statistical analysis 20 3. Results 21 3.1 Amino and fatty acid profiles of the experiment diet 21 3.2 Attractiveness of the experimental diets to olive flounder 25 3.3 Survival and growth performance of olive flounder fed the experimental diets at the end of the 8-week feeding trial 28 3.4 Feed consumption and utilization of olive flounder at the end of the 8-week feeding trial 28 3.5 Biological parameters of olive flounder at the end of the 8-week feeding trial 32 3.6 Hematological parameters of olive flounder at the end of the 8-week feeding trial 32 3.7 Non-specific immune activity of fish at the end of the 8-week feeding trial 32 3.8 Chemical composition of the whole body of fish 32 3.9 AA and FA profiles of the whole body of fish at the end of the 8-week feeding trial 33 4. Discussion 41 Chapter 3. Inclusion effect of jack mackerel meal as feed stimulants in diets replacing different levels of fish meal with various animal protein sources on growth performance of olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) 47 1. Introduction 48 2. Materials and methods 51 2.1. Experimental conditions 51 2.2. Design of the study and preparation of the experimental diets 51 2.3. Sampling and measuring biological indices of the experimental fish 52 2.4. Plasma biochemical analysis of the experimental fish 56 2.5. Lysozyme and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity assay 56 2.6. Analyzing the chemical composition of the diets and whole-body fish 57 2.7. AA analysis of the experimental diets and whole-body fish 57 2.8. FA analysis of the experimental diets and whole-body fish 58 2.9. Statistical analysis 58 3. Results 59 3.1. AA and FA profiles of the experimental diets 59 3.2. Performance of olive flounder at the end of the 8-week feeding trial 63 3.3. Chemical composition of the whole-body fish in the 8-week feeding trial 68 3.4. AA and FA profiles of the whole-body fish in the 8-week feeding trial 68 3.5. Hematological parameters of the fish in the 8-week feeding trial 68 3.6. Non-specific immune responses of the fish in the 8-week feeding trial 68 4. Discussion 75 Chapter 4. Substitution effect of different levels of fish meal with various plant protein sources in diets supplemented with jack mackerel meal as feed stimulants on the growth, feed utilization, chemical composition, amino and fatty acid profiles, and non-specific immune response of juvenile olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) 81 1. Introduction 82 2. Materials and methods 87 2.1. Experimental conditions 87 2.2. Design of the study and preparation of the experimental diets 87 2.3. Sampling and measuring biological indices of the experimental fish 91 2.4. Plasma biochemical analysis of the experimental fish 91 2.5. Lysozyme and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity assay 91 2.6. Analyzing the chemical composition of the diets and whole-body fish 92 2.7. AA analysis of the experimental diets and whole-body fish 92 2.8. FA analysis of the experimental diets and whole-body fish 93 2.9. Statistical analysis 93 3. Results 94 3.1. AA and FA profiles of the experimental diets 94 3.2. Performance of olive flounder at the end of the 8-week feeding trial 98 3.3. Chemical composition of the whole-body fish in the 8-week feeding trial 102 3.4. AA and FA profiles of the whole-body fish in the 8-week feeding trial 102 3.5. Hematological parameters of the fish in the 8-week feeding trial 102 3.6. Non-specific immune responses of the fish in the 8-week feeding trial 102 4. Discussion 109 Chapter 5. General Discussion 115 References 124 | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | 한국해양대학교 해양과학기술전문대학원 | - |
dc.rights | 한국해양대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다. | - |
dc.title | Inclusion effects of jack mackerel meal in diets containing different protein sources for olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) | - |
dc.title.alternative | 다양한 단백질원을 함유한 넙치용 배합사료내 전갱이분의 첨가 효과 | - |
dc.type | Dissertation | - |
dc.date.awarded | 2023-02 | - |
dc.embargo.terms | 2023-03-03 | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Hae Seung Jeong | - |
dc.contributor.department | 해양과학기술전문대학원 해양과학기술융합학과 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliation | 한국해양대학교 해양과학기술전문대학원 해양과학기술융합학과 | - |
dc.description.degree | Doctor | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 정해승. (2023). Inclusion effects of jack mackerel meal in diets containing different protein sources for olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus), Jack mackerel meal, Feed attractants and/or stimulant, Fish meal substitution, Alternative animal protein source, Alternative plant protein source | - |
dc.identifier.holdings | 000000001979▲200000003272▲200000665394▲ | - |
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.