(An) Empirical Study on the Efficiency of Container Terminals in Russian and Korean Ports using DEA model
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | MARIIADEN | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-22T02:16:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-02-22T02:16:43Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-03-12 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://kmou.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000002235528 | ko_KR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.kmou.ac.kr/handle/2014.oak/8129 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The steady growth of seaborne trade has resulted in the increase of container ships, ports and their container terminals. The operating efficiency of a container terminal is the critical element for its competitiveness in the international market. The aim of this research is to evaluate the efficiency of container terminals and to study how to improve their scale efficiency. In this paper the efficiency and performance is evaluated for 31 container terminals in Russian and South Korean seaports in 2010-2014, using DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis), a non-parametric linear programming method, which evaluates relative efficiencies of a homogenous set of decision making units (DMUs) in the presence of multiple input and output factors. Similar comparative studies of Russian and Korean ports/terminals operating efficiency were not conducted previously. The results show that the total average of Korean terminals’ operating efficiency scores is higher in both DEA-CCR and DEA-BCC models, in comparison with Russian efficiency scores. Russian terminals showed relatively low scale efficiency and relatively high VRS efficiency scores that may indicate that resource utilization is relatively efficient, but the operational sizes of the terminals are not proper. Korean terminals showed relatively high scale efficiency and relatively low VRS efficiency scores that may indicate that input level (the size of the terminals) is chosen correctly, but container terminals are not using their resources efficiently. Most Russian container terminals show increasing returns to scale, whereas Korean terminals show tendency to constant returns to scale. | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | List of Tables 4 List of Figures 5 Abstract 7 Chapter 1. Introduction 9 Chapter 2. Theoretical Review 11 2.1. The Concept of Efficiency 11 2.1.1. The Definitions of Efficiency 11 2.1.2. Measurement of Port Efficiency 13 2.1.3. Port Competitiveness and Efficiency-Related Researches 16 2.2. General Concept of DEA 17 2.2.1. Meaning of DEA 17 2.2.2. An Application Procedure for DEA 21 Chapter 3. Characteristic and Analyze of Ports and Terminals 28 3.1. Features of the Port and Container Terminals in Russia. 28 3.1.1. Infrastructure of Seaports. 28 3.1.2. Container Terminals in Russia. 35 3.2. Features of the Port and Container Terminals in South Korea. 44 3.2.1. Infrastructure of Seaports. 44 3.2.2. Container Terminals in Korea. 52 Chapter 4. DEA Empirical Analysis 55 4.1. The Data 55 4.2. DEA – CRS and DEA – VRS Results. 57 4.3. Scale Efficiency and Returns to Scale. 65 Chapter 5. Summary and Conclusions 70 References 72 | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Graduate School of Korea Maritime and Ocean University | - |
dc.title | (An) Empirical Study on the Efficiency of Container Terminals in Russian and Korean Ports using DEA model | - |
dc.title.alternative | DEA방식을 활용한 한국과 러시아 콘테이너 항만의 효율성에 대한 실증연구 | - |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.awarded | 2016-02 | - |
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.