한국해양대학교

Detailed Information

Metadata Downloads

Numerical Analysis of Innovative Hydrogen Mitigation Measure and Passive Autocatalytic Recombiner in Nuclear Power Plant

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author KHORCHONGLEE -
dc.date.accessioned 2017-02-22T02:24:55Z -
dc.date.available 2017-02-22T02:24:55Z -
dc.date.issued 2016 -
dc.date.submitted 2016-03-12 -
dc.identifier.uri http://kmou.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000002235949 ko_KR
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kmou.ac.kr/handle/2014.oak/8365 -
dc.description.abstract The basic goal of severe accident management in nuclear power plants (NPPs) is the protection of the containment integrity and the containment becomes the ultimate barrier against the release of fission products to the environment. There are various potential challenges to the containment integrity during a severe accident in a light water reactor (LWR). For most NPPs, severe accidents lead to hydrogen release rates that exceed the capacity of hydrogen control measures at conventional design basis accident. High local hydrogen concentrations can be reached in a short time, leading to combustible gas mixtures in the containment. Moreover, a long term pressure build-up may occur due to steam generation through decay heat and/or through the generation non-condensable gas from the interaction of the molten core with the containment basement concrete. The implementation of hydrogen mitigation measures is aimed in general to prevent and limit hydrogen explosion consequences for the containment, the reactor and auxiliary buildings. Therefore, depending on the NPP type, hydrogen mitigation measures are designed to meet specific safety criteria and requirements. In addition to mitigation measures, gas composition monitoring system is often used to check if the requirements are satisfied and to provide relevant information to NPP operators during accident and severe accident conditions. Passive autocatalytic recombiners (PARs) have been developed and have become commercially available hardware in the last decade. PARs are simple devices, consisting of a catalyst surfaces arranged in an open-ended enclosure. In the presence of hydrogen (with available oxygen), a catalytic reaction occurs spontaneously at the catalyst surfaces and the heat of reaction produces natural convection flow through the enclosure, exhausting the warm, humid hydrogen-depleted air and drawing fresh gas from below. Thus, PARs do not need external power or operator action. PAR capabilities are ultimately subject to mass transfer limitations and may not keep up with high hydrogen release rates in small volumes, for example, as could exist in the immediate vicinity of the hydrogen release. In this study, varies of tests were conducted on different PAR’s designs to investigate and improve the hydrogen recombination rate. The innovative modifications on the current PAR model were carried out to foresee the unpredictable conditions and potential risks in the NPPs, and hence be adaptable in any circumstances to mitigate the hydrogen mitigation consequences. Although there is none hydrogen mitigation measures could be the best resolution in every single NPPs, the lessons learnt from the Fukushima accidents that hydrogen safety inspection was carried out on all Korean NPPs by Korean government and PARs will be implemented in all operating and under-construction plants. -
dc.description.tableofcontents Table of Contents Table of Contents ···················································································· IV List of Tables ···························································································· VII List of Figures ························································································· VIII Abstract ······································································································ XII Nomenclature ···························································································· XV Greek Symbols ························································································ XVI Abbreviations ··························································································· XVI Chapter 1 Introduction ·············································································· 1 1.1 History background ········································································ 1 1.2 Overview of international hydrogen risk assessment ············ 2 1.3 Study outline ··················································································· 3 1.4 Passive autocatalytic recombiner (PAR) ···································· 4 Chapter 2 Consideration on hydrogen explosion in APR1400 containment building small breakup loss of coolant accident ········· 7 2.1 General ····························································································· 7 2.2 Background introduction ······························································· 8 2.3 Calculations grids and conditions ·············································· 10 2.3.1 Geometry and grids ··························································· 10 2.3.2 Mathematical model and calculation conditions ·········· 11 2.4 Results and condition ·································································· 15 2.4.1 Gas behavior and hydrogen explosion risk ·················· 15 2.4.2 Gas concentration and explosion risk ··························· 20 2.4.3 Hydrogen explosion scenario ··········································· 28 Chapter 3 Proposal and analysis of hydrogen mitigation system guiding hydrogen in containment ······················································ 30 3.1 General ························································································ 30 3.2 Introduction ················································································· 31 3.3 Proposal of a mitigation system ············································ 33 3.3.1 Simulation conditions ······················································ 33 3.4 Results and discussion ······························································ 35 3.4.1 Gas behavior in the shallow reservoir containment 35 3.4.2 Gas behavior in the deep reservoir containment ··· 38 Chapter 4 CFD analysis of the effect of different PAR locations against hydrogen recombination rate ·················································· 43 4.1 General ························································································ 43 4.2 Introduction ················································································· 43 4.3 Mathematical modeling ····························································· 45 4.4 KNT PAR calculations ······························································ 48 4.4.1 Mesh and conditions ······················································· 48 4.4.2 Results ··············································································· 50 4.5 PAR installed locations ····························································· 51 4.5.1 Mesh and conditions ······················································· 51 4.5.2 Results and discussion ···················································· 62 Chapter 5 Proposal and analysis of flow considered-design new PAR models ······························································································ 65 5.1 General ························································································ 65 5.2 Introduction ················································································· 65 5.3 Mathematical model and calculation condition ··········· 68 5.4 Model description ······························································· 71 5.5 Results and discussion ······················································ 75 5.5.1 Flow induction ························································· 75 5.5.2 Gas distribution variations scenario ···················· 76 5.5.3 Hydrogen induced area ·········································· 79 5.5.4 Maximum PAR recombination performance ······ 83 Chapter 6 Conclusion ······································································· 89 Acknowledgement ·············································································· 92 References ·························································································· 93 -
dc.language eng -
dc.publisher 한국해양대학교 -
dc.title Numerical Analysis of Innovative Hydrogen Mitigation Measure and Passive Autocatalytic Recombiner in Nuclear Power Plant -
dc.type Thesis -
dc.date.awarded 2014-03 -
Appears in Collections:
기계공학과 > Thesis
Files in This Item:
000002235949.pdf Download

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse