선박온실가스 배출규제를 위한 배출권거래제도 적용연구
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 이보라 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-22T06:20:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-02-22T06:20:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 57016-04-17 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://kmou.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000002175183 | ko_KR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.kmou.ac.kr/handle/2014.oak/9354 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Republic of Korea has promoted reduction of Greenhouse Gas, through implementation of Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading Scheme on inland high-emission sectors of the gas, in order to contain risk of environmental change. To the contrary, shipping sector is preparing systems to control greenhouse gas emission through comprehensive regulation on every merchant vessel of the world, under segmented approach of IMO(International Maritime Organization). In 2011, discussion has already been made in market-based measures on vessels, followed by technical & operational greenhouse gas regulation. Especially, Emission Trading System, one of traditional market-based measures, is being discussed with great emphasis. However, when it comes to shipping industry, limitation exists in authorizing vessel operators stated in Safety Management Certificate (SMC), as argued in proposal of Emission Trading System, and in equally applying this system according to differences in method of possession, occupation and usage of vessel under contract structure. Contrary to the fact that Emission Trading System of inland sectors is implemented on point pollution sources, management of the proposed system in shipping sector is difficult due to vessel’s characteristic as non-point pollution source. Furthermore, although shipping industry is capital-intensive one, there are various difficulties, for example issue of response to the entry of Emission Trading System, resulting from discrepancy in manning level between global shipping giants and small and medium-sized companies. In conclusion if Emission Trading System is considered for market based measure to reduce greenhoue gas from ships, polluter pays principle shall be strongly embodied in implementing the system through auction when it comes to allowance method. And to make sure the certainty of curbing the greenhouse gas emission as well as to reach the sustainable development of Non annexⅠ countries, the thesis emphasizes the limitation on using the credit created from some developing countries, and from industry related greenhouse gas. Despite the anticipated problem and recommendation, as emission trading system requires sophisticated design for securing the effectiveness e.g. emission cap, emission allowance, MRV(Monitoring, Reporting and Verification), and submit credit etc, further studies are hopefully recommended to make better understanding. | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 목 차 Abstract 제1장 서 론 ····························································· 1 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 ·················································· 1 제2절 연구의 내용 및 방법 ·················································· 4 제2장 온실가스 배출규제의 일반적 개념······························· 6 제1절 온실가스 배출규제의 의의············································ 6 제2절 국제기구를 통한 온실가스 배출규제································ 10 Ⅰ. 국제연합··································································· 10 1. 기후변화협약······························································ 10 2. 교토의정서································································ 12 Ⅱ. 국제해사기구····························································· 16 제3절 주요국가의 온실가스 배출규제 ····································· 20 Ⅰ. 우리나라··································································· 20 1. 수도권 대기환경개선에 관한 특별법·································· 20 2. 저탄소 녹색성장 기본법················································ 22 3. 온실가스 배출권의 할당 및 거래에 관한 법························· 23 Ⅱ. 유럽연합··································································· 23 Ⅲ. 일본········································································ 28 Ⅳ. 미국········································································ 29 제3장 시장기반적 온실가스 배출규제 제도··························· 31 제1절 시장기반적 온실가스 배출규제 제도································ 31 제2절 배출권 거래제도························································ 33 Ⅰ. 배출권의 개념···························································· 35 Ⅱ. 배출권 거래제도의 특징················································· 38 1. 온실가스 배출 감축목표················································· 40 2. 배출권의 할당···························································· 40 3. 참여대상··································································· 47 4. 거래시장 활성화 방안··················································· 48 5. 배출권의 거래···························································· 50 6. 산정, 보고 및 검증······················································ 51 제4장 부문별 온실가스 배출규제 노력······························· 53 제1절 항공부문································································· 53 Ⅰ. 기관별 온실가스 배출규제 노력······································ 53 1. 국제민간항공기구························································ 53 2. 유럽연합··································································· 54 Ⅱ. 항공부문 배출권거래제도 편입 위헌 소송···························· 56 제2절 해운부문································································· 58 Ⅰ. 제안문서··································································· 58 1. 노르웨이 제안···························································· 58 2. 영국 제안·································································· 61 3. 프랑스 제안······························································· 63 Ⅱ. 각국 제안문서의 공통 요구사항······································· 65 제5장 선박 배출권거래제도 적용한계 및 제언························ 68 제1절 선박 배출권거래제도 적용의 한계··································· 68 Ⅰ. 법률적 책임주체 설정의 한계········································· 68 Ⅱ. 배출권 차입 제한························································ 71 Ⅲ. 배출권거래제도의 도입 형식··········································· 73 Ⅳ. 참여범위··································································· 75 Ⅴ. 할당방법··································································· 77 Ⅵ. 단계별 적용······························································· 79 제2절 선박 배출권거래제도 적용을 위한 제언···························· 81 Ⅰ. 오염자부담 원칙의 이행··············································· 81 Ⅱ. 교토크레딧 사용의 제한················································· 87 Ⅲ. MRV 제도의 확립······················································· 92 Ⅳ. BUBBLE, NETTING 제도의 도입···································· 93 제6장 결 론 ···························································· 96 참고문헌································································ 99 | - |
dc.language | kor | - |
dc.publisher | 한국해양대학교 대학원 | - |
dc.title | 선박온실가스 배출규제를 위한 배출권거래제도 적용연구 | - |
dc.title.alternative | A Study on the Application of Emission Trading System | - |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.awarded | 2013-08 | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | LEE BORA | - |
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.