한국해양대학교

Detailed Information

Metadata Downloads

海洋紛爭의 平和的 解決에 관한 硏究

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author 宋映周 -
dc.date.accessioned 2017-02-22T07:22:50Z -
dc.date.available 2017-02-22T07:22:50Z -
dc.date.issued 2002 -
dc.date.submitted 56797-10-27 -
dc.identifier.uri http://kmou.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000002174090 ko_KR
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kmou.ac.kr/handle/2014.oak/10722 -
dc.description.abstract The outbreak of international disputes is inevitable as long as nations exist. The elimination of international disputes is, to all intents and purposes, impossible. International disputes have lead to war or the use of armed force, however in accordance with Article 2, paragraph 3, of the Charter of the United Nations, a peaceful means should be found to resolve disputes peacefully. Guided by Article 33, paragraph 1, of the Charter. The peaceful resolution of international disputes is divided into political solutions and judicial solutions. Political solutions include, but are not limited to, directed negotiations, negotiations through international conference, mediations, international inquiries, and international conciliation. Judicial solutions include arbitration, special arbitration, court's decisions and so forth. Many countries have difficulty resolving maritime disputes. Many standard methods have been used in attempts to resolve international maritime disputes, but there are also distinctive procedures for maritime disputes. The United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea 1982 (UNCLOS-III), implemented in 1994, provides for the settlement of disputes. Nothing in the Part impairs the right of any States Parties to agree at any time to settle a dispute between them concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention by any peaceful means of their own choice. UNCLOS-III provides for the resolution of international maritime disputes through peaceful means that include peaceful settlement, courts and tribunals. Courts and tribunals can be one or more following means: (a)The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea established in accordance with Annex VI, (b)the International Court of Justice, (c)an arbitral tribunal constituted in accordance with Annex VII, (d)a special arbitral tribunal constituted in accordance with Annex VII for one or more of the categories of disputes specified therein. The decision of the court or tribunal having jurisdiction entails binding decisions. However, a coastal State shall not be obliged to accept the submission to such settlement of any dispute arising out of the exercise by the coastal State of a right or discretion. Additionally, a state may declare, in writing, that it does not accept any one or more of the procedures provided for in respect to one or more of the following categories of disputes: (a)disputes relating to sea boundary delimitations, or those involving historic bays or titles, (b)disputes concerning military activities and law enforcement activities in regard to the exercise of sovereign rights or jurisdiction, (c) disputes in respect of which the Security Council of the United Nations is exercising its assigned functions. While, UNCLOS-III is provides means for maritime dispute settlement through peaceful means, it contains extensive limitations and exceptions. Thus, the current system of maritime conflict resolutions is ambiguous and, at times, self-defeating by allowing too many alternate methods and exceptions to the resolution process. A more concise mechanism for conflict resolution should be instituted. It is suggested that such a mechanism would be similar in form and function to the International Court of Justice. -
dc.description.tableofcontents 목차 Abstract = iii 第1章 序論 = 1 第1節 硏究 背景 및 目的 = 1 第2節 硏究 範圍 및 方法 = 3 第2章 國際紛爭의 發端과 平和的 解決節次를 爲한 國際立法 = 4 第1節 國際紛爭의 類型과 解決方法 = 4 1.1 國際紛爭의 國內的 救濟와 外交的 保護權의 發動 = 4 1.2 紛爭類型과 紛爭解決方法 = 5 第2節 紛爭의 平和的 解決節次를 위한 國際立法 = 8 2.1 1907년 國際紛爭의 平和的 解決에 관한 헤이그 協約 = 8 2.2 1928년 國際紛爭의 平和的 解決에 관한 一般議定書 = 9 2.3 1962년 두 當事者 중 一方만이 國家인 國際紛爭解決을 위한 仲裁裁判과 調停에 관한 規則 = 9 2.4 1965년 國家와 他國民과의 投資紛爭解決에 관한 協約 = 10 第3章 國際 海洋紛爭의 政治的 解決 方法 = 11 第1節 外交的 手段에 의한 政治的 解決方法 = 11 1.1 直接交涉 = 11 1.2 仲介 = 21 1.3 事實調査 = 26 1.4 調停 = 32 제2절 國際組織을 통한 政治的 解決方法 = 36 2.1 UN에 의한 解決 = 37 2.2 地域的 協定 또는 機構에 의한 解決 = 41 第4章 國際 海洋紛爭의 司法的 解決 方法 = 46 第1節 仲裁裁判 = 46 1.1 仲裁의 形態 = 47 1.2 依賴 內容과 條件 = 48 1.3 仲裁 判定의 根據 = 49 1.4 仲裁 判定의 效果 = 50 1.5 仲裁의 效用 = 52 第2節 國際司法裁判 = 53 2.1 組織 및 節次 = 53 2.2 法院의 業務 = 61 第5章 UN 海洋法協約上 紛爭解決制度 = 68 第1節 槪觀 = 68 1.1 紛爭解決手段 選擇의 自由 = 69 第2節 拘束力 있는 決定을 낼 수 있는 强制的 節次 = 70 2.1 强制的 解決의 原則 = 70 2.2 强制解決 原則에 대한 例外 = 72 第3節 UN 海洋法協約上 紛爭解決을 위한 機構와 節次 = 75 3.1 調停 = 75 3.2 仲裁 = 77 3.3 特別仲裁 = 79 3.4 國際海洋法裁判所(ITLOS) = 81 3.5 海底紛爭裁判部 = 83 第6章 結論 = 87 參考文獻 = 92 -
dc.publisher 韓國海洋大學校 -
dc.title 海洋紛爭의 平和的 解決에 관한 硏究 -
dc.title.alternative A Study on the peaceful settlement of maritime disputes -
dc.type Thesis -
Appears in Collections:
해사법학과 > Thesis
Files in This Item:
000002174090.pdf Download

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse