한국해양대학교

Detailed Information

Metadata Downloads

글로벌 얼라이언스 전략을 통한 해운기업의 경쟁력 제고 방안에 관한 연구

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author 이영훈 -
dc.date.accessioned 2017-02-22T05:54:26Z -
dc.date.available 2017-02-22T05:54:26Z -
dc.date.issued 2014 -
dc.date.submitted 57044-06-27 -
dc.identifier.uri http://kmou.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000002174705 ko_KR
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kmou.ac.kr/handle/2014.oak/8780 -
dc.description.abstract Abstract A Study on Enhancement Method of Competitiveness for Shipping Liners through Global Alliance Strategy Lee, Young-Hoon Department of Port Logistics, Graduate School, Maritime Industrial Studies, Korea Maritime University (Directed by Professor Chang, Myung-Hee) Recently, we are facing kinds of paradigm shifts going on in the global liner shipping markets such as Global Alliance in lieu of Shipping Conference in strategic coalition system, slow steaming instead of full steaming in vessel operation for bunker-cost savings and Ultra Large Container Ships (ULCS) drastically substituting Panamax & Post Panamax-class container ships in shipping liners for achieving economy of scale and etc., Among these paradigm shifts, especially, three Global Alliances of P3, G6 and CKYHE have been announced to be launched during 2014 in order to strategically cope with continued recessions in liner shipping markets started from 2008 due to economic crisis triggered by Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.'s moratorium in USA, which has been swiftly spreaded and influenced global slumps including Europe, China, Japan, Korea and other global countries. In these circumstances, to study on three Global Alliances would be much important and essential for enhancement of competitiveness for shipping liners. The three Global Alliances named P3, G6 and CKYHE are all setting goals for efficiently getting over the long-lasting slumps and recessions in the shipping industries. To effectively overcome the huge losses which shipping liners undergo for several years, they are now strategically getting together for exchange of vessel spaces, common use of calling terminals and even exchange of containers, equipments and appliances in every shipping route and area. Furthermore, P3 has already ordered and deployed Ultra Large Container Ships such as 18,000TEU-class called triple-E in shipping market and G6 Alliance is now planning to order over 20,000TEU-class ULCS in the near future to strategically and efficiently compete with P3. And CKYHE Alliance is also known to be under negotiation with shipbuilding companies for ordering ULCS-class Eco-ships mainly oriented by Evergreen. These shifts in shipping industries could be an opportunity for some leading shipping liners, but could be a threat for other small shipping ones. Therefore, this study especially focuses on the domestic shipping liners of Hyundai Merchant Marine and Hanjin Shipping for their improvement of competitiveness through these Global Alliance strategies. And mainly by adopting SWOT analysis method, this paper describes four factors of Strength, Weakness, Opportunity and Threat for respective three Global Alliances by using all related time-series data (tables and drawings) obtained from various reference books, papers and news material. This study herewith provides seven enhancement methods for competitiveness through the Global Alliance strategies for two outstanding national shipping liners of Hyundai Merchant Marine and Hanjin Shipping in Korea as follows -
dc.description.abstract First, to reduce operation costs per TEU by obtaining ULCS- class Eco-ships at their earliest. Second, to reduce bunker costs through collective purchase together with respective member liners in all possible routes. Third, to make agreements of mutual use for all the available vessel space, equipment, terminal and appliance solely tied-up between Hyundai Merchant Marine and Hanjin.Shipping. Forth, to introduce and manage an integrated and combined terminal system similar to PSA (Port of Singapore Authority) in new-port of Busan. Also secure and establish logistics facilities which fully accommodating ship-bunkering and oil storage & transaction station in the same terminal. Fifth, to get support of shipping financing and establishment of shipping guaranty fund from relevant Government authorities. Sixth, to secure government subsidy on scrapping for the ships under/including Panamax-class. Finally, to share invested costs for ULCS-class Eco-ships between G6 and CKYHE Alliance for mutual enhancement of competitiveness against P3 Alliance. With the seven methods above mentioned, hope this study could be helpful for those who are facing with these paradigm shifts in global shipping area. -
dc.description.tableofcontents <목 차> Abstract ........................................................................... v 제1장 서 론 .................................................................... 1 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 ....................................................................... 1 제2절 연구의 방법 및 범위 ....................................................................... 3 제2장 해운시장의 환경변화와 글로벌 해운 얼라이언스의 출범 배경 .................. 5 제1절 글로벌 해운시장의 환경변화 .......................................................... 5 1. 컨테이너 정기선 해운시장의 현황 ........................................................................ 5 2. 해운동맹과 해운 얼라이언스의 개요 및 동향 ...................................................... 14 제2절 글로벌 해운 얼라이언스의 출범 배경 ......................................... 25 1. 컨테이너 정기선 해운시장의 패러다임 변화 ......................................................... 25 2. 해운동맹(Shipping Conference)의 약화 .................................................................. 27 3. 글로벌 금융위기와 해운시황의 침체 ....................................................................... 29 4. 규모의 경제 및 비용절감을 통한 경쟁력 제고 ..................................................... 31 제3절 전략적 제휴에 관한 선행연구 ........................................................ 33 1. 국외 연구 ........................................................................................................................ 33 2. 국내 연구 ........................................................................................................................ 35 제3장 3대 글로벌 해운 얼라이언스의 현황 및 특징 비교.................. 42 제1절 3대 글로벌 해운 얼라이언스의 현황 ........................................... 42 1. P3 해운 얼라이언스의 현황 ....................................................................................... 42 2. G6 해운 얼라이언스의 현황 ....................................................................................... 47 3. CKYHE 해운 얼라이언스의 현황 ............................................................................. 51 제2절 3대 글로벌 해운 얼라이언스의 특징 비교 .................................. 54 1. P3 해운 얼라이언스의 특징 ........................................................................................ 54 2. G6 해운 얼라이언스의 특징 ........................................................................................ 56 3. CKYHE 해운 얼라이언스의 특징 .............................................................................. 58 제4장 3대 글로벌 해운 얼라이언스의 효과와 경쟁력 제고 방안 ........................ 61 제1절 3대 글로벌 해운 얼라이언스에 대한 효과 분석 .................. 61 제2절 3대 글로벌 해운 얼라이언스에 대한 SWOT 분석 ................ 71 제3절 3대 글로벌 해운 얼라이언스 전략을 통한 경쟁력 제고 방안 ................................. 88 1. 글로벌 해운 얼라이언스의 확대 및 지속가능성 ...... ......................................... 88 2. 얼라이언스 전략을 통한 국적선사의 경쟁력 제고 방안 ..................................... 90 제5장 결 론 ................................................................. 103 제1절 연구결과의 요약 ............................................................................ 103 제2절 연구의 시사점과 한계점 .............................................................. 104 참 고 문 헌 ................................................................... 106 -
dc.language kor -
dc.publisher 한국해양대학교 해사산업대학원 -
dc.title 글로벌 얼라이언스 전략을 통한 해운기업의 경쟁력 제고 방안에 관한 연구 -
dc.type Thesis -
dc.date.awarded 2014-08 -
dc.contributor.alternativeName Lee -
dc.contributor.alternativeName Young-Hoon -
Appears in Collections:
항만물류학과 > Thesis
Files in This Item:
000002174705.pdf Download

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse