北極海 環境리스크 管理를 위한 事前配慮原則의 適用에 관한 硏究
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 허성례 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-22T06:15:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-02-22T06:15:45Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 57042-05-01 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://kmou.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000002175082 | ko_KR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.kmou.ac.kr/handle/2014.oak/9237 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The climate change symbolized as global warming is one of the issues intensely discussed in the recent international society. Especially, the thawing of the Arctic ocean due to the temperature rise of the Arctic region has been mentioned by various media as the representative harmful effect of climate change. Since the thawing of the Arctic ocean causes the rise of the whole sea level, which can become a threat to the earth's ecosystem, it is recognized not as a problem of the neighboring countries, but as an environmental problem that should be dealt by the whole mankind. In the other side of such recognition of environmental problem, the world attention is focused on the new economic opportunity that will be generated by the thawing of the Arctic. With the international attention focused on the Arctic, Arctic countries are showing actions to protect their own interests in the Arctic region. As one of such movements, Arctic countries have intense competitions to secure submarine resources by reinforcing dominium and maritime jurisdiction. Especially according to UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, Arctic countries have started actively moving to secure the 200-nautical mile continental shelf in international waters around the Arctic pole. Also with the increased interest in ship routes of the Arctic ocean which can be another economic resource in it, there are more frequent trial voyages to estimate the role as a new silk road between Europe and Asia. The changes in the Arctic has such two faces. Those two aspects including environmental preservation and development of the Arctic are questionable about if they really cannot be mixed together just like water and oil. In the era of industrialization, the development and environmental preservation were mutually incompatible. In modern society, however, they tend to aim for coexistence under the topic of sustainable development. The development and marine environmental preservation of the Arctic should be progressed toward this direction. This article focuses on the approach of international law, in the aspect of applying Precautionary Principle for sustainable development of the Arctic ocean. Despite of the accumulated existing researches on Precautionary Principle, there are still insufficient researches considering environment on specific regions, especially the Arctic region. Currently, there are relatively accumulated theses related to the Arctic ocean, mostly focusing on the resource development and its problem in the Arctic ocean, and Arctic countries' development of marine territory while there is almost no thesis focusing on environmental protection. This thesis primarily referred literature and theses, and then secondarily reviewed the theme of this thesis and relevant major international precedents, including cases of International Court of Justice(here in after, referred to as ICJ), Permanent Court of Arbitration(PCA) and WTO appeals organization. Also relevant information was collected from homepage of relevant international organizations such as International Maritime Organization(IMO) and Arctic Council. The study methods selected for discussions in each Chapter are different depending on the relevant themes, and they are like following. Chapter 2 considered theoretical basis of general definition, effects and application of Precautionary Principle. Reviewing the definition for the unity of the term and the general requirements to apply Precautionary Principle, the effects of applying Precautionary Principle to environmental protection were considered. After ruling the meaning of environmental risk used to apply Precautionary Principle, rather than the risk of environmental pollution daily used, the application of Precautionary Principle was considered as measures of regulating environmental risk. Chapter 3 reviewed the actual application and significance of Precautionary Principle under international law. Through such actual application and significance, we identify whether Precautionary Principle has been recognized as a common law under international law, and also suggest opinions about the status of Precautionary Principle. Chapter 4 reviews regional cooperative mechanism, treaties and agreements under international law applied to control the current marine environmental pollution in the Arctic ocean, and then based on it, suggests imperfections after checking the conditions of marine environmental protection in the Arctic ocean. Chapter 5 suggests the application of Precautionary Principle as an international law device that can complement such imperfections identified through Chapter 4. By reinterpreting UN Marine Environmental Protection Law which is the basic order of marine environment through Vienna Treaty in modern perspective, it shows a legal basis that can thicken marine environment protection of the Arctic ocean through Precautionary Principle. As the treaties of IMO controlling vessels as pollution sources are more likely to have characteristics of Precautionary Principle, it not only recommends the measures ruled by these treaties, but also have attempts for development and marine environmental protection through regional treaties and international cooperation. Chapter 6 suggests the conclusion of this thesis based on the study results above. In order to cope with environmental risk of the Arctic ocean, it is urgently needed to introduce Precautionary Principle. Here, Precautionary Principle is not such unconditional environmental protection and preservation, but precautionary legal mechanism of marine environment based on the principle of sustainable development. Thus it is necessary to balance between conflicting interests of development and marine environmental protection of the Arctic ocean through regional sea treaties and ecological foundation management to cope with overall marine environmental risk of the Arctic ocean as Arctic countries also should actively accept the treaty based on Precautionary Principle. | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Abstract 제1장 서론 1 제1절 연구의 목적 1 제2절 연구의 범위 및 구성 2 제3절 연구의 방법 4 제2장 사전배려원칙의 이론적 기초 6 제1절 사전배려원칙의 기원 6 제2절 사전배려원칙에 관한 이론 검토 8 Ⅰ. 사전배려원칙의 의의 8 Ⅱ. 사전배려원칙의 목적 10 Ⅲ. 사전배려원칙의 적용요건 11 1. 과학적 불확실성 11 2. 위험의 분석 12 3. 수긍할 수 있는 위험의 존재 12 4. 비례성의 원칙 존중 13 5. 비차별 조건과 일관성 요구 13 6. 손해가 중대하고 회복할 수 없는 것일 것 14 7. 새로운 과학 자료의 수용 14 Ⅳ. 사전배려원칙의 효과 15 1. 입증책임의 전환 15 2. 환경용량 접근방법의 부정 16 제3절 환경리스크의 규제와 사전배려원칙 18 Ⅰ. 환경리스크의 규제와 문제점 18 1. 리스크의 의의 18 2. 환경리스크의 규제 24 3. 환경리스크 규제의 문제점 26 Ⅱ. 환경리스크의 규제를 위한 사전배려원칙의 적용 28 제3장 사전배려원칙의 국제법적 지위 31 제1절 국제규정에 반영된 사전배려원칙의 지위 31 Ⅰ. 선언 및 헌장 31 1. 북해회의 각료 선언 31 2. 세계자연헌장 33 3. 지속가능한 개발에 관한 베르겐 선언 34 4. 리우 선언 35 5. Agenda 21 36 Ⅱ. 국제 협약 37 1. 범세계적 협약 37 2. 지역 협약 48 제2절 국제판례상의 사전배려원칙의 지위 59 1. 1995년 핵실험 사건 59 2. 1996년 핵무기 위협 및 사용의 합법성에 대한 권고적 의견 61 3. Gabčikovo-Nagymar Project 사건 62 4. MOX Plant 사건 64 제3절 국제관습법상의 사전배려원칙의 지위 71 1. 현대 국제관습법의 형성 71 2. 조약을 기초로 한 국제관습법의 형성가능성 72 3. 결의에 기초한 국제관습법의 형성 가능성 74 4. 사전배려원칙의 국제관습법적 지위 76 제4장 북극해 환경보호를 위한 국제협약 및 규제현황 80 제1절 범 세계적 협약을 통한 북극해 환경보호 80 Ⅰ. UNCLOS 80 1. 해양환경보호 및 보전의 일반원칙 80 2. UNCLOS의 북극해 적용 84 Ⅱ. IMO 협약 89 1. 유류오염에 의한 해양환경 오염 89 2. 해양투기에 의한 오염 91 3. IMO의 협약의 북극해 적용 96 Ⅲ. Polar Code 97 1. Polar Code의 제정 97 2. 환경보호 100 Ⅳ. 범 세계적 협약을 통한 리스크 규제의 현황 101 1. UNCLOS의 북극해 환경 리스크 규제 101 2. IMO의 협약에 의한 북극해 환경 리스크 규제 103 제2절 지역협약을 통한 북극해 환경보호 104 Ⅰ. UNEP의 지역해 프로그램 104 1. UNEP 지역해 프로그램 개괄 104 2. 지역해 프로그램의 대표적인 사례 106 3. 지역해 프로그램의 북극해 적용 117 Ⅱ. PAME의 환경보호 전략 118 1. 개괄 118 2. 북극해에서의 선박 항해와 해양오염 방지 119 3. 생태계기반 접근을 통한 통합 관리 120 Ⅲ. 지역 협약을 통한 해양환경 리스크 규제 현황 122 제5장 북극해 환경리스크 규제를 위한 사전배려원칙의 적용 124 제1절 범 세계적 협약상 사전배려원칙의 적용 124 Ⅰ. UNCLOS상 사전배려원칙의 적용 124 1. 조약법협약의 시제법적 활용과 해석 124 2. 시제법을 활용한 UNCLOS의 해석 129 Ⅱ. IMO 해양환경오염관련 규제협약상 사전배려원칙의 적용 131 1. IMO에서의 사전배려원칙의 지위 131 2. IMO 협약의 사전배려원칙의 적용 135 제2절 지역협약에 의한 사전배려원칙의 적용 145 Ⅰ. UNEP의 지역해 프로그램 145 1. 지중해 행동계획 145 2. 북극 지역해 협약 150 Ⅱ. 생태계기반 해양공간관리 151 1. 북극해의 EA의 지도 지침 151 2. 북극해의 생태계기반관리와 사전배려원칙의 적용 156 제6장 결론 161 참고문헌 165 | - |
dc.language | kor | - |
dc.publisher | 한국해양대학교 대학원 | - |
dc.title | 北極海 環境리스크 管理를 위한 事前配慮原則의 適用에 관한 硏究 | - |
dc.title.alternative | A Study on the Application of the Precautionary Principle for Management of the Arctic Marine Environment Risk | - |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.awarded | 2014-02 | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Huh | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Seong-Rye | - |
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.