선박가압류의 집행에 관한 연구
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 김상중 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-22T06:18:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-02-22T06:18:50Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 56823-07-21 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://kmou.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000002175156 | ko_KR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.kmou.ac.kr/handle/2014.oak/9322 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Marine transportation and marine-related activities cannot operate without ships, Everyday the number and scale of disputes involving these activities and the ships they require are increasing rapidly. According to international law, ships are required to be registered by competed government authority. This is done primarily a ship mobility and its huge value, but also for the sake of keeping maritime order and maintaining maritime safety In order to provide basic knowledge for the further discussion and specify the issues to be analyzed, the definition of 'ship', concept of arrest of ships, and the main issues and problems in respect to the arrest of ships will be dealt with. The concept and function of arrest of ships is also different under different legal systems. The concept of arrest of ship under the common law system orginates in `action in rem` and emphasizes the jurisdiction-acquiring function of arrest of ship. By contrast, the concept of arrest of ship under the continental law system is based on the theory of preservation, emphasizes the preservative function of arrest of ship and only permits `action in personam` The arrest of ship under the korean legal system follows continental law system and is different to common law system. As a result, the enforcement of arrest of ships causes many problems. For example, with regard to the arrest procedure, the vessel may be arrested relatively easily without any hearings by prima facie evidence showing existence of a debt. And It is general practice that the judge orders the claimant to deposit about 1/10 of the claim amount with the court before he issues the decision of the Court. It is possible for the claimant to provide to release to deposit the full amount of the claim, however, the debtor or very poor. because he is spend on much time and cost. This dissertation consists of five chapters. In the first chapter, the purpose, method and scope of this research will be stated along with a general overview. In the second chapter, An introduction to issue of the arrest of ships, I will define the arrest of ship and explain the scope of my study. This chapter will explain general authority of arrest of ships, enforcement on arrest of ships, and the international convention on the Arrest of ships of 1999. The third chapter, will refer to the objects of the arrest of ships. That is, The lawfulness shipowner and flag on convenience referred to the problems. In the forth chapter, the procedure for provisional ship arrest will be illustrated. In the final chapter, the dissertation summary will be provided and the legalzation of the korean provisional ship arrest system will be suggested as a conclusion for the dissertation. untill now on, there isn't enough to study about the enforcement on an arrest of ship, so I'd like a lot of an expert to study about this problem lively more than now. | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第1章 序論 第1節 硏究의 目的 1 第2節 硏究의 範圍와 方法 3 第2章 船舶假押留制度 및 船舶執行의 槪觀 第1節 船舶假押留의 定義와 目的 5 I. 船舶假押留의 定義 5 Ⅱ. 船舶假押留의 目的 7 第2節 船舶執行에 대한 態樣 8 I. 船舶假押留와 船舶競賣에 있어서의 船舶執行 8 Ⅱ. 船舶假押留와 監守·保存措置에 있어서의 船舶執行 10 第3節 船舶假押留의 執行對象 13 I. 外國船舶 13 Ⅱ. 登記에 關한 與否 15 Ⅲ. 建造 中인 船舶 17 Ⅳ. 其他 19 第4節 船舶假押留의 原因債權 20 I. 原因債權의 槪念 20 Ⅱ. 船舶優先特權에 의한 船舶假押留 22 Ⅲ. 外國判決 또는 仲裁判決에 기한 船舶假押留 25 第5節 船舶假押留의 申請節次 27 I. 申請書의 記載事項 27 Ⅱ. 請求와 保全의 必要에 대한 疏明書類 29 Ⅲ. 船舶假押留申請의 添附書類 30 Ⅳ. 審理, 裁判과 執行 33 V. 船舶假押留의 效力 35 第6節 船舶假押留에 관한 國際條約 35 I. 船舶假押留條約의 主要內容 36 Ⅱ. 우리나라 수용에 대한 檢討 45 第3章 船舶假押留의 船舶執行의 對象에 관한 問題 第1節 船舶假押留의 執行에 關한 準據法과 管轄權에 關한 問題 47 I. 準據法에 關한 問題 47 Ⅱ. 管轄權에 關한 問題 50 Ⅲ. 結語 56 第2節 登錄된 船主가 아닌 者에 대한 船舶假押留 57 I. 問題提起 57 Ⅱ. 傭船契約의 性質에 따른 傭船者의 態樣 59 Ⅲ. 法律關係의 比較 60 Ⅳ. 結語 61 第3節 便宜置籍船에 對한 船舶假押留 63 I. 槪要 63 Ⅱ. 便宜置籍과 法人格否認理論 65 Ⅲ. 重要判例評釋과 結語 70 第4章 船舶假押留의 船舶執行節次上의 問題 第1節 船舶假押留의 制限(商法 第 744條)에 關한 問題 75 I. 立法趣旨와 問題點 76 Ⅱ. 商法 第 744條의 解釋 80 Ⅲ. 結語 85 第2節 違法·不當한 船舶假押留 89 I. 槪要 89 II. 不當假押留로 인한 損害賠償訴訟의 管轄 및 準據法 90 Ⅲ. 違法·不當한 船舶假押留로 인한 損害賠償 訴訟의 要件 91 Ⅳ. 結語 94 第3節 船舶國籍證書등 受取執行 現況과 問題點 95 I. 受取執行 現況 및 問題點 95 Ⅱ. 結語 98 第4節 船舶假押留의 執行節次取消 등을 위한 解放供託에 대한 問題 98 I. 槪要 및 現況 99 Ⅱ. 結語 101 第5章 結 論 104 參考文獻 104 | - |
dc.language | kor | - |
dc.publisher | 한국해양대학교 대학원 | - |
dc.title | 선박가압류의 집행에 관한 연구 | - |
dc.title.alternative | A Study of Enforcement on the Areest of Ships | - |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.awarded | 2005-08 | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Sang Jung | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Kim | - |
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.